If you carefully read each quantum technology news, you will notice they make No progress, just using misleading phrases to get your hopes up. No progress in research on fictional quantum computer, which is said to be faster (← No proof ! ) using parallel-world computing. Quantum mechanics is useless, so it needs to create " imaginary target = quantum computer" to deceive taxpayers and governments. (Fig.3) ↓ The media uses misleading phrases The overlap integral ( of two different wavefunctions ) which gives Pauli exchange energy is not an usual electron's probability density (= integral of two same wavefunctions ), so no physical meaning (= Pauli principle can not be expressed using real things ) ! "Unsolvable" means No exact solution, No constant total energy = No conserved energy, which proves quantum mechanics is wrong. Pauli exclusion principle is valid only when Schrödinger equation is unsolvable with No exact solution. Only in this unsolvable Schrödinger equation, Pauli principle appears.īecause symmetric (= E+ ) and antisymmetric (= E- ) wavefunctons give different total energies by integral (= only when Schrödinger equation is unsolvable ), that energy difference means Pauli principle ( this p.14 ). Physicists just choose approximate fake solution with freely-adjustable parameters, and integrate those fake solution instead of solving it ( because they cannot solve it ), which gives fake total energies E ±. Schrödinger equation of multi-electron atoms is unsolvable with No exact solution. (Fig.2) ↓ Only "unsolvable" Schrödinger equation gives Pauli energy ? This is self-contraditory and shows quantum mechanics is wrong. Only when Schrödinger equation has No exact solution ( which means Schrödinger equation is false ), Pauli principle is effective. If No exact solution is found, Schrödinger equation is false. So if Schrödinger equation is solvable, this exact solution cannot express Pauli principle. The energy difference between symmetric (= + in the upper figure ) and antisymmetric (= - ) wavefunctions means Pauli exclusion energy.īut if the two-electron atom has the exact solution E, the energy difference between symmetric and antisymmetric disappears and invalidates Pauli exclusion principle. This Pauli principle is just an old, nonphysical, artificial rule with No physical meaning. Quantum mechanics claims Pauli exclusion principle is expressed as " antisymemtric wavefunction" where exchanging two electrons' labels 1 and 2 changes the sign of the total wavefunction. Just exchanging the labels 1 and 2 gives the same wavefunction of the same energy E ). Suppose this "exact" solution of two-electron atom is " φ 1ψ 2 " ( or φ 2ψ 1 The numbers 1, 2 are labels of electrons 1, 2. If even two-electron atoms have exact solution (= solvable Schrödinger equation ), Pauli principle is meaningless and invalidated. Only in one-electron hydrogen atom, Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics has the exact solution which always gives the constant total energy E wherever an electron is. This is the reason why physicists still cannot show physical meaning of Pauli principle, except nonphysical math. In fact, Pauli principle contradicts the original definition of quantum mechanics. This abnormal state has continued for 100 years since quantum mechanics was born ! This unknown Pauli principle is the main factor which prevents our science from advancing. Unless we can accept Pauli principle as "real force", we can not calculate the total force applied to each particle to predict chemical realction, because the total force must be the sum of Pauli repulsion and other Coulomb force. Still No physical meaning of Pauli principle ( this p.6, this p.3 ) Pauli principle says two electron with the same spin cannot occupy the same orbital due to Pauli exclusion repulsion, which is a measurable real force.īut quantum mechanics never admits Pauli principle to be a real force. Pauli exclusion principle is uncanny like spin. (Fig.1) ↓ If Schrödinger equation is solvable, Pauli principle disappears. Summary Pauli principle is self-contradictory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |